Wednesday, July 28, 2004
9/11 Commission Report
An unresolved mystery: The mass murder of 9/11
by Elias Davidsson
On July 22, 2004, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (a bi-partisan Congressional body) issued its Final Report on the events of September 11, 2001. This document of over 500 pages is posted on the internet. It has been presented as the "unanimous conclusion" of the Commission members on what happened on that day and on the reasons for the failure to prevent the attacks. The Commission exonerates American public officials from any blame for such failure. . . (more)
This article recaps why this 'report' is so bogus.
An unresolved mystery: The mass murder of 9/11
by Elias Davidsson
On July 22, 2004, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (a bi-partisan Congressional body) issued its Final Report on the events of September 11, 2001. This document of over 500 pages is posted on the internet. It has been presented as the "unanimous conclusion" of the Commission members on what happened on that day and on the reasons for the failure to prevent the attacks. The Commission exonerates American public officials from any blame for such failure. . . (more)
This article recaps why this 'report' is so bogus.
Sunday, July 25, 2004
Newsy Notes from the LYNNE STEWART Persecution
A great bit of the trial that might be overlooked
from Thursday - -
not to mention these old tapes from 1993 have nothing to do with any defendants as they had no contact with the 'blind sheik' then! Yet 1993 tapes get brought to bear as feds wish it so (plus they have sooooo much tape from then, fist hand, second hand, third hand. forth hand and fifth hand, unenhanced and enhanced).
(scroll to bottom:)
http://cryptome.org/usa-v-ssy-26.htm
"19 MS. BAKER: Your Honor, if I might add one factor.
20 Your Honor admitted some of the other Abdel Rahman
21 trial exhibits for their probativeness as to the state of mind
22 of Abdel Rahman as well and your Honor has now -- and many of
23 those are Abdel Rahman's own speeches or sermons which your
24 Honor has heard. It is a theme of Abdel Rahman in his speeches
25 that where something occurs that is un-Islamic or wrong, that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
4256
47LSSAT7
1 there is an obligation to speak out against it. So part of the
2 significance of this call and of the reporting of the operation
3 to Abdel Rahman is that when it is reported to him he does not
4 condemn it and say that it's wrong. He accepts the report.
5 MR. TIGAR: Your Honor, I first want to apologize.
6 The dates at the bottom was indistinct on some of the pages of
7 mine, so I now understand that this apparently did take
8 place -- this call did tell us what this was.
9 We maintain our view and I think what we have just
10 heard raises a different set of issues. If this is to be
11 admitted with respect to Abdel Rahman, the conspirator here,
12 then we have to look at the fact that it's a 1993 statement and
13 not only is there a question of pendency but after that he gets
14 convicted and his lawyers are working with him and so on. It
15 gets to be somewhat remote.
16 And the second, of course, is to tell this jury or to
17 argue to this jury that by one's silence one gives consent to
18 violence, it is a very dangerous road to start out as the
19 relevance theory. I don't want to discuss this at length. You
20 know, St. Thomas Moore in his trial discussed that whole issue
21 but I am not talking about that.
22 We oppose it.
23 THE COURT: All right."
The Feds are trying to show someone is guilty if an (illegal) tap is placed on their phone and an item is mentioned that they 'do not denounce' it shows they are guilty of criminal conspiracy!!
This is a very important bit of state persecution unknown to the press as they are
absent during most of this!
Friday, July 16, 2004
Newsy Notes from the LYNNE STEWART Persecution
Just for our sake Lynne Stewart is now publishing her own blog!!!
=whew= hard to keep up, so hats off to the Stewart IT team! Plus they have daily transcripts!
Check it out at LynneStewart.org!
Friday, July 02, 2004
Newsy Notes from the LYNNE STEWART Persecution
On Thursday (7-1) I got there a little late but I think it was a no jury morning of discussion of admissability or relevance of evidence. Discussion mostly was on some taped dialogue. I missed if quote was attributed to blink sheik or from sympathizer overseas who had minions under his control.
Anyway, scary quote involves destroying America, sinking ships and blowing things up. It is the gem in the crown of the prosecution as it is heart of their "conspiracy". So directions on the tape are what they accuse defendants of facilitating and or distributing. While scary idea, Mr. Tiger pointed the whole quote would be sheik saying "If they kill me in prison you are to. . . blah blah". As this seems to be a will and subject is alive it is not a viable plot of intended action now. I'm paraprasiong this badly but there didn't seem to be much press in galley Thurday. It was a pretty good exchange. Prosecution guy looked like the batboy going up against a major league pitcher. He sort of warbled when he set forth his plea to include this piece of surveillance sound recording tape. Kind of got swatted about by the judge.
Then Mr. Tiger did his objection to the tape as evidence. He didn't go to the bench. He walked to the lecturn that has a mike and confidently made mince meat out of the feds. A great orator at work. Jist of it seems to be that the gov't. has big technical building where tapes are taped, daily backups re-recorded on some big tape and the daily 'running' tape gets recorded over for next days' tap -- (destroying content). But the big tape is connected to other investigations. So gov't says defence cannot inspect tape as it contains extraneous classified tapes. But defence has the right to all evidence.
So Mr. Tiger argued for the whole tape and threw this good scrolding in. He saidstate cannot charge clients with conspiracy without saying
- What conspiracty was
- With whom
- And at what time they conspired
Which sort of blows gov't case. Lots more to it. Especially about first amendment and if it just protects some speech or all speech.
He mentioned a slew of 1st Amendment cases including Brandenberg.
Too bad it didn't have more in gallery as it was a lot of good points taken.
| "From unseemly flatteries they passed by degrees to savage acts." -- Annals by Tacitus |
|
More Weasle Fun! - 
Disclaimer: news posted here is in the public interest and not for profit or for advertising purposes. The information contained in this blog, and its associated web sites, is provided as a service to the Internet community, and does not constitute perfect truth. We try to provide quality information, but we make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this web site and its associated sites. Furthermore, any information from The New York Times may be plagiarised. Use caution when quoting the Times. It is common knowledge they don't have fact-checkers. Any defamation of the Republican Party is not inadvertent, however, but we make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the Republican Party, as they are known to be thugs, goons and sponsors of usurping idiot weasels.
| ||||
 
Advertise Here Contact the Weasel News
|
