Monday, March 20, 2006
Agent Slams FBI Bosses at Moussaoui Trial
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - The FBI agent who arrested Zacarias Moussaoui in August 2001 accused headquarters of criminal negligence for its refusal to investigate Moussaoui aggressively after his arrest, according to court testimony Monday.. . . Despite Samit's urgent pleadings, FBI headquarters refused to open a criminal investigation and refused Samit's entreaties to obtain a search warrant.
"You needed people in Washington to help you out?" MacMahon asked.
"Yes," Samit said.
"They didn't do that, did they?"
Samit said no.
He confirmed under questioning that he had attributed FBI inaction to "obstructionism, criminal negligence and careerism" in an earlier report.
Just wondering why the mainsream media is hiding this explosive testimony.
The FBI acted like they wanted Moussaoui free to be a fall guy in the aftermath of Sept. 11th.
Hmmm . . . sounds just like James Earl Ray and the prison-linked items like the transistor radio with his prison ID number on it being 'found' at the scene of the assasination of Dr. King. And if only the FBI could link these 'clues' together it wouldn't have happened. Yeah. Its the FBI leaders who stopped agent Samit and all the other translators, investigators and FBI agents from doing their job.
What motive is there for this other than protecting the real sabateurs in the whitehouse???
moussaoui
Comments:
Post a Comment
| "From unseemly flatteries they passed by degrees to savage acts." -- Annals by Tacitus |
|
More Weasle Fun! - 
Disclaimer: news posted here is in the public interest and not for profit or for advertising purposes. The information contained in this blog, and its associated web sites, is provided as a service to the Internet community, and does not constitute perfect truth. We try to provide quality information, but we make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this web site and its associated sites. Furthermore, any information from The New York Times may be plagiarised. Use caution when quoting the Times. It is common knowledge they don't have fact-checkers. Any defamation of the Republican Party is not inadvertent, however, but we make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the Republican Party, as they are known to be thugs, goons and sponsors of usurping idiot weasels.
| ||||
 
Advertise Here Contact the Weasel News
|
